Ideally, the parental plan and the time-sharing agreement are collaborative documents that are the result of negotiations, compromises and agreed terms. But this is not the case in all situations. If the parties are unable to present an education plan with each other over time, the court will develop a plan that binds the two advancing parties. The court will consider the best interests of the child in the development of an education plan, taking into account considerations such as: a parenting model based either on assigned parental rights and responsibilities, or on housing plans and decision-making powers, is most consistent with this neutral approach, in which there is no pre-presumption of parental responsibility. On the contrary, parental injunctions within these two models would address and explicitly assign parental responsibility, including the granting of significant decision-making powers. Although this approach seems to resemble a common general model, i.e. general responsibility is shared until an order provides for something else, there are subtle but important differences. Australian law provides for the sharing of parental responsibility, unless otherwise stipulated. This model of parental responsibility could provide for the sharing of parental responsibility until the order is ordered elsewhere.

The regulations could also require that an education decision clearly specify the distribution of parental duties, including decision-making power. Moreover, as has already been mentioned, this approach is consistent with the current practice of parents sharing custody until a court order, agreement (or tacit consent) provides for something else. In designing a model based on general responsibility, it would be important to address the problem of the relationship between higher missions and overall responsibility. Will parental responsibility exist before and before an educational mission, unless otherwise stated? Would the responsibility for parenthood arise from certain types of educational mandates? Or would higher missions be needed to target the different dimensions of overall responsibility? If you can`t agree on custody or access, you`ll probably walk past the installers.